Real Christians Are Not Bigots
May 11, 2012 Leave a comment

where interesting ideas have sex and breed like rabbits
May 11, 2012 Leave a comment

May 10, 2012 Leave a comment
So you have defined marriage as being between a man and a woman.
Have you considered defining “man” and “woman”?
After all, there are many varieties of gender, not just the two. There are the common XX and XY types. BUt I am told that there are also XXY, XXXY, Y with mutated X, and X with mutated Y, the intersexed, the transgendered and, I am sure, more.
So why stop at defining marriage? Think of the government jobs that could be created by requiring blood tests AND chromosomal and genital exams for every marriage license. For those of indeterminate gender, some kind of panel will have to be formed, to see what gender category the person fits in and whether they can be permitted to love someone who is not their exact opposite in chromosomal distribution.
Really, it’s just like miscegenation: once you say “white” and “black” don’t mix, you’re in a pickle. Who, exactly, is white, and who, exactly, is black? Some definitions really are useless for any but the most academic use, and applying them to law just makes life and governing more difficult.
You think you have settled the matter, NC. But your work has just begun.

May 7, 2012 Leave a comment

Do you know about the San Juan Generating Station, owned (in part) and operated by PNM? Or the Four Corners plant on Navajo land nearby, owned mostly by Arizona and Southern California utilities? These plants are each almost 40 years old, and are requiring hundreds of millions of dollars of upkeep because it’s older, therefore dirtier, technology. Rather than retire these plants, and transitioning to wind, solar, and geothermal – energy sources that don’t generally cause asthma in children, for example – the owner utilities prefer to keep these behemoths limping along.
Bad business loves company, and we are not alone. Apparently much the same problem is occurring in Canada, where protesters, including one Nobel Prize laureate, blocked the train tracks taking coal to the offending plant.

Of course, somehow, the police in Canada have also come to believe that their responsibility is to protect smoke stacks that kill people and damage the environment, rather than helping the people to shut down the plant.
RCMP Police Chief Roseberry, also on the scene in White Rock, stated that her concern was for public safety, and preventing human injury as a result of protesters on the train tracks.
Which must be why she arrested protesters. It’s a crazy world.
“Coal is a likely target for climate stability advocates because it has the highest greenhouse gas emissions per unit of energy of all fossil fuels and because there is enough economically available coal to trigger run away climate change.”
“Nobel Prize Laureate and SFU professor Dr. Mark Jaccard was among those arrested. “I’m a naïve product of working class Burnaby,” he said. “I’ve never broken a law in my life. I’m very uncomfortable taking this position. If governments were acting to reduce GHG emissions, or slow the rate of increase, I wouldn’t be here today,” he continued. “I’d be helping those governments to do that. But in the last few years, especially in Canada under Harper, the emphasis has been on accelerating the rate at which we are destroying the planet. So I have to ask myself and I have to ask everyone else, ethically, what is the right thing to do? It’s made me read more about civil disobedience, people like Mahandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King and Henry David Thoreau.””
PNM is holding their shareholders meeting at their offices at 4th and Silver in Albuquerque on May 15, a week from tomorrow. There will be a protest there that morning.
Inform yourselves. Here is PNM’s info on San Juan. And here is a statement from a New Mexico environmental group that gives an overview of the battle to close down dirty coal.
April 5, 2012 Leave a comment
Remember the video I posted by Thomas Linzey, who talked about how to circumscribe the power of corporations in our communities? Well, we have another victory to celebrate, this time in Las Vegas, New Mexico. As an article in the Las Vegas Optic explains,
The ordinance seeks to elevate the civil rights of the community and of its natural resources while limiting the rights currently enjoyed by corporations.
Moments after the vote, as jubilant backers of the controversial measure were celebrating, the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association notified the city attorney that it would be filing suit over the matter.
April 3, 2012 Leave a comment
There are moments when I wonder why a particular speech, article, or instance of oppression, has not been the spark that ignited the fuse that led to a revolution.
The following speech is a case in point. (The link is to the first of four segments. The total length is about 30 minutes.) The speaker is Thomas Linzey, cofounder of the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund. His assertions and solutions are – and I mean every syllable of this overused term – revolutionary.
I will be writing more about this speech and the topics he covers in the near future, but I didn’t want to delay in recommending the video to you. If you suspect that the deck is stacked against the survival of people and nature, Mr. Linzey will confirm those suspicions, give you a glimpse of the root causes, and tell you what some people are beginning to do about it. We do not have time to waste.
Sometimes the reason a spark can’t light the fuse is that they haven’t been brought together. Please share this speech widely.
If, after viewing, you are wondering what to do, here are some options. (You know, the media always tell us what’s wrong. They never tell us what we can do about it. Which is one reason we feel frustrated and helpless. I’m going to tell you what you can do about it. Then it’s up to you and me.)
99% Spring offers training in nonviolent resistance between April 9 and 15. Find a training near you. (I attended the training for trainers, and will be assisting as needed in California, where I will be that week.)
April 28 March Against the War on Women, occurring in every state capitol and Washington, D.C.
May 1 General Strike nationwide.
UPDATE: Last night, on APril 2, Las Vegas, New Mexico became the first community in the state to pass an ordinance like what Mr. Linzey discusses in this speech.
I would remind you that “Change is just the way things are.” Things always change, and never do so without agents of change. If things don’t change in the direction needed, it is because we are not the agents of change. Someone else is. But if they can be, we can be.
As the people of Las Vegas demonstrated last night.
As we demonstrated to force an inquiry into the death of Trayvon Martin.
And stopping the legal imposition of some of the invasive medical procedures that state and federal legislatures wanted to impose on women without their consent.
We are just beginning.
March 29, 2012 1 Comment
WHAT they are doing to Tim DeChristopher is unconscionable, cruel, and unusual. Did this man crash the world economic system? Did he enrich himself at the expense of others? He ought not to even be in prison, and they have placed him in isolated confinement.
Isolated confinement means that DeChristopher has limited access to reading materials, can only make 15 minutes of phone calls per month, and is allowed only rarely out of a 8 by 10 cell holding him and another inmate, according to Peaceful Uprising. He’ll be there pending an investigation, and the group has “no idea what they’re investigating nor how long it will take,” a representative said.
If this was the 1870′s I’d suggest a jail break. IS there at least an ongoing vigil at the prison?
THIS kind of BS is the reason I will march for women’s rights on April 28, join the general strike on May 1, and do whatever else it takes to monkey wrench a system that treats people like Tim DeChristopher as criminals while actual criminals like the ones who crashed our economic system for their own benefit and have *knowingly* compromised the futures of billions of people and thousands of species by continued depredations against the environment – these criminals against humanity and the planet continue to walk free and get their pictures on the covers of magazines.
FREE Tim DeChristopher!

UPDATE: Even while I was writing this post, Tim DeChristopher was released from isolation. That’s good news.
But the question remains: WHY is this man in prison in the first place, when so many others have not even been prosecuted?
March 27, 2012 Leave a comment
In a word: nothing. There is not a thing you can do about the high price of gas. Nope. Carbon companies are in business to maximize their price, margins and profits. If they don’t, their stockholders can sue them. They are not, after all, B Corps.
And please: if you see something like the following
ignore it. It’s delusional, and Snopes debunked it years ago. Saying that we shouldn’t buy gas on this day matters to carbon companies as much as if you said we shouldn’t buy gas between the hours of 3 and 4 PM. They don’t notice, and wouldn’t care if they did. What you don’t buy between 3 and 4 you will buy before then or after then.
There are three problems with this suggestion, the least of which is that it won’t work. The second problem is that it ignores the waste and pollution occasioned by cheap fuel. The third, and most important, problem is that, as activism goes, it is passive, not active. It makes us dependent on carbon companies to operate against their interests.
Let’s start with the good news: this protest won’t work. Not all misguided efforts benefit from being utterly ineffectual. If all we are doing is buying the same amount of gas a day earlier or later, it won’t raise a blip on the carbon companies’ weekly, much less annual, reports. Oil is becoming scarce. We learn in Econ 101 that as a commodity becomes scarce, it becomes more expensive. The most this protest will do is inconvenience protesters.
A friend in the auto industry declared that oil companies have no moral obligation to keep prices low, and he’s right. If anything, he said, their obligation to the environment would lead them to keep prices high, because high prices reduce demand and discourage waste.
Which suggests the next question and its answer: why would we want this protest to work anyway? We’ve had among the lowest gas prices in the industrialized world for the better part of a generation, and we have the lowest fuel economy of any auto-making country. The desire for lower gas prices is incompatible with environmental concerns. The only reason to want lower gas prices is that it costs us too much. That issue looms so large for some people that they can’t think clearly.
It’s like reading about the collapse of bee colonies around the world and worrying about whether the price of honey will rise. We may understand some of the implications, but we’re missing the main point, which is close by.
Lowering the price of gas is not the only way to lower its cost to us. We are not so dependent and helpless as we think.
Whether we write letters, wave placards, sign online petitions, or send checks, we are sending one consistent message: we are unable to do anything about this ourselves, so we are asking the people in charge to help. But what if that’s not true, and not just about the price and cost of gas, but about other things as well?
Small changes can cause big change. If we stop focusing on price, and start focusing on cost, everything tilts. Suddenly we are in the position of taking action instead of asking for help with something we can do ourselves. We can begin to address environmental and other issues that we may be surprised to find are connected to the way we deal with our gas problem.
Here’s how to lower your costs. And I promise you – I guarantee you – that, unlike the April 15th placebo, this will work. It will be like magic: you will be able to lower your cost without the price of gas going down a penny. You can wait for someone else to lower the price for you, but they won’t do it. They don’t care. It’s not their job, anyway. It’s up to you, and it’s something you can do without asking permission.
Here are some alternative ways to spend April 15th. Go online to cars.com. Click “Research Cars”. Find a used car that gets at least 20% better gas mileage than your current car. You want it to be significantly better to make it worth your trouble. Do this for each and every car you own. It may take you an hour, but probably not. If you have a car that gets 22 MPG, combining your usual city/highway usage, and you replace it with a car that gets 20% better mileage (26.5 MPG, roughly) you will, in effect, lower your cost of gas from $3.75/gallon to $3.00/gallon. You don’t have to wait for some overpaid CEO in Gucci loafers (does Gucci still make loafers?) and a Rolex watch to give a damn.
Want to do more? If your used car has a lower insurance rate attached to it, you’re saving money on insurance. If you send e-mails to co-workers or friends and begin planning to carpool one or more days per week – and maybe have breakfast that day before work, or play pool and have a beer after work – then you have kept still MORE money out of the pockets of Big Carbon and Big Insurance and in your own, and you’ve had a chance to network or visit with friends. Without having to ask permission. It gets better.
Are you paying to go to a gym and ride a stationary bike? You know where I’m going with this. Get a real bike and ride it to work. Spend less on gas, insurance, and that gym membership. Also, save visits to the doctor about your cholesterol, your high blood pressure . . . That’s not all.
By doing it yourself, all manner of things begin to fall into place. Opportunities arise to spend more time with friends and co-workers, to get into shape, to make the difference you told yourself you wanted to make after New Year’s or during Lent or after your last doctor’s visit.
Doesn’t it make you wonder why we’ve allowed ourselves to become dependent on others to do what we can do, especially when they are unlikely to do it?
If we can, single-handedly, lower the cost of gas, the cost of owning a car, and diminish our impact on the environment, all without asking permission, without waiting for a response, without the price going down a penny, what else can we do?
Don’t like the commercialism of Christmas?
Don’t like stores selling you food sprayed with poison and dripping with trans fat?
Don’t like what the US government is doing with your taxes?
Worried about the mass extinction that is already under way?
Don’t like how banks can play fast and loose with the rules (which they have written, remember), and yet get bailed out?
Using the model above, we can do something significant about every one of those things, without waiting for someone else to fix it. If we just can’t abide that these problems persist, we can enlist friends and family members to join us in getting it done ourselves.
We must begin with the realization that being concerned or angry is not enough. Asking corporations and government to fix it has not, and will not, work. Have you noticed them do anything to turn back climate change? Even the ones who squeal about debt have had no trouble borrowing and deferring payment when their party has been in office. Hell, who knew you could buy a war – or two – on credit?
Action is no longer just one option. It has become an urgent necessity.
We need to begin by doing, rather than by asking someone else to do what is against their interest – a futile request if ever there was one. Once we’ve begun, we find that we can affect more than we thought possible on our own. But what do we do when our government suspends habeas corpus? Or when a corporation, in a Mordor-like frenzy for short-term profits, fouls the food, air and water needed to sustain life itself?
We don’t ask them to stop. We tell them they must stop. If they have bought politicians who have allowed them to write laws to say that they can do what they want, putting profits before people, as they are used to doing, we either run for office (people do, you know), or we come to understand that these are, truly, matters of life and death for us and our children. And then we do whatever is necessary.
We made dozens of advertisers flee Rush Limbaugh’s show.
We made the Komen Foundation reverse their decision to stop funding Planned Parenthood.
We made the US Justice Department and a grand jury investigate the killing of Trayvon Martin.
Spring has just begun. As Kurt Vonnegut wrote in Timequake, “We have been sick for a long time, but we are better now, and there is work to do.”
This is a Do-It-Yourself Revolution. Outsourcing is so 20th century.

Making the Old Ways Obsolete
March 25, 2012 5 Comments

Size 16. Really.
You may have heard that there is a march on April 28 against the War On Women. I was wondering what I could do to encourage folks to march, if the state legislatures’ inroads on women’s rights hasn’t already provided the right motivation. Obviously there is already enough substance to motivate people. But what about fun and flash? Many people care about the issues, but think that a march is not really their thing. Yet we need them to come out and help us show the numbers of women and their male allies who have taken notice – and umbrage. So, substance is provided. What can I do, as a man, to encourage women and men alike to march on April 28?
What else?
If 50 of my friends sign up to march with me in Santa Fe, I will do this march . . . in High Heels. Yes, remarkably, they do make heels in size 16. (I have no real interest in knowing why.
)
I encourage you to find creative ways to encourage *your* friends to march. If you tell them a 6’5″ 56 year old man with size 16 feet will be marching in high heels, that might be enough of a draw for some. But I’m only marching in Santa Fe.
I drew inspiration for this idea from a group called Walk A Mile In Her Shoes. They create marches – and photo ops of men in heels – around the world so men can demonstrate that rape, sexual assault and gender violence are not acceptable in their communities.
Please register through the national organizing page on Facebook or visit the website and follow the three steps to join the official March for your state. Thank you, and spread the word!
We will turn the tide. We will have fun with each other while doing it. And I, at least, will look gooood.

Mayberry Gone Wild
March 22, 2012 2 Comments
I’m not talking about your Twitter followers.
The question conveys the sense of threat that you would feel walking down a darkened city street and becoming suddenly aware that large armed men are following you.
There is no privacy any more. None. Warrantless wire taps? Remember those? Surveillance equipment is like weaponry: no system has ever been built that has not been used against someone perceived to be a threat. “We don’t need no stinking warrants.”
Once we secure the rights of women once again, we should work to have a constitutional amendment to protect privacy. Our state and local governments, far from protecting our rights, are proving themselves to be eager agents of their erosion. The corporations we’re paying for services are their accomplices.
According to this article in Wired Magazine, the NSA is constructing a building that will be 5 times the size of the US Capitol when completed and require 60,000 tons of cooling equipment: as much as was needed for the two World Trade Center towers. It’s high-tech, high level clearance purpose:
to intercept, decipher, analyze, and store vast swaths of the world’s communications as they zap down from satellites and zip through the underground and undersea cables of international, foreign, and domestic networks. The heavily fortified $2 billion center should be up and running in September 2013. Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails—parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital “pocket litter.”
They are giving particular attention to breaking encryption codes.
According to another top official also involved with the program, the NSA made an enormous breakthrough several years ago in its ability to cryptanalyze, or break, unfathomably complex encryption systems employed by not only governments around the world but also many average computer users in the US.
“Look at our new toy,” you can almost hear them squeal. “Whose privacy shall we invade? We must be sneakier than Murdoch.”
They can know everything we are doing, but we are not permitted to know anything our public servants are doing. Why?
The plans for the center show an extensive security system: an elaborate $10 million antiterrorism protection program, including a fence designed to stop a 15,000-pound vehicle traveling 50 miles per hour, closed-circuit cameras, a biometric identification system, a vehicle inspection facility, and a visitor-control center.
Because we are a threat to them, apparently. They could have restricted their surveillance to international traffic.
. . . the agency could have installed its tapping gear at the nation’s cable landing stations—the more than two dozen sites on the periphery of the US where fiber-optic cables come ashore. If it had taken that route, the NSA would have been able to limit its eavesdropping to just international communications, which at the time was all that was allowed under US law. Instead it chose to put the wiretapping rooms at key junction points throughout the country—large, windowless buildings known as switches—thus gaining access to not just international communications but also to most of the domestic traffic flowing through the US. The network of intercept stations goes far beyond the single room in an AT&T building in San Francisco exposed by a whistle-blower in 2006.
Wired’s main source for the article is an ex-NSA crypto-mathematician (whatever that is). He reminds me a bit of Greg Smith, who recently made a very public exist from his former employer, Goldman Sachs.
Binney left the NSA in late 2001, shortly after the agency launched its warrantless-wiretapping program. “They violated the Constitution setting it up,” he says bluntly. “But they didn’t care. They were going to do it anyway, and they were going to crucify anyone who stood in the way. When they started violating the Constitution, I couldn’t stay.”
But what about those telecom companies that are always sending us unsolicited info to assure us that they are looking out for our privacy? ”Spokespeople for Verizon and AT&T [who have been implicated in this work] said their companies would not comment on matters of national security.” In other words, they bestow their loyalty on those who are spying on us, citizens and customers. Why wouldn’t their loyalty be to those who pay them? Perhaps because they have invested in office holders, and have received, for their patronage, laws and regulations favorable to their formation of near monopolies. Who is your local provider of cell phone coverage? This is very different than asking, “Who is your provider of local cell phone coverage?” That would be Sprint, Verizon, AT&T, T Mobile. There are NO local cell coverage providers. Those whom we pay to provide the service are “in cahoots” with the government that wants that information. Corporations pay a lot to lobby and support the re-election of politicians who help them out with favorable regulations. They, in turn, funnel money which they earn from us into politicians’ re-election campaigns. It’s a pretty sweet party that we are paying for and are excluded from.
(This scenario reminds me of the relationship between oil and gas companies and the military. We pay for oil. The companies pay for politicians’ re-elections, who continue to pass regulations favorable to those companies. Meanwhile, we go to war against countries who have been selling oil to these same companies – countries whose militaries are financed by the money we pay to put gas in our tanks. Militaries that our military, our sons and daughters, must fight, at huge cost to our families and our economy. So we pay, in effect, for our army, their army, the huge corporate profits, and the re-election of the politicians who make the feedback loop possible.)
If you think your AES 256 bit encryption is crack-proof . . . you might not want to take any bets on that.
“Remember,” says the former intelligence official, “a lot of foreign government stuff we’ve never been able to break is 128 or less. Break all that and you’ll find out a lot more of what you didn’t know—stuff we’ve already stored—so there’s an enormous amount of information still in there.”
In other words, they have been storing even the material they haven’t been able to read, on the assumption that, with further breakthroughs, it won’t be a problem. So what you have encrypted today, and so well encrypted that no one can break it, with current knowledge . . . they’re putting that in their “To Open Later” file.
Big Brother is here. Quiet bugger, isn’t he?
