New Mexico’s Rich, Sunny Future

According to this article in the Guardian UK, ‎Germany’s solar infrastructure produced 22 GW of power last Saturday.

That was enough to power 40-50% of Germany. That is the equivalent of 20 nuclear power plants running at full capacity.

Germany is 138,000 square miles in total area with 81 million people.

Germany increased its solar capacity by 50% in the last year. Its 22 Solar GW provided power for 32 to 40 million people.

New Mexico is 121,500 square miles with 2 million people.

If Germany can generate 22 solar GW, how much more could New Mexico generate – and sell – with its sunnier, more southerly location? It’s true that the average American uses significantly more power than the average German. But not 20 times more.

New Mexico could run entirely on solar power – using coal or gas only for nighttime power until storage issues are resolved – and make a lot of money from selling the surplus to 20 or 30 million people in surrounding states. New Mexico could be to solar power what Alaska is to oil. (Not to mention what Arizona and Texas, with more people and bigger economies, could do. Not to mention wind power, and efficiency initiatives.)

If only PNM, the Public Regulatory Commission (the PRC), and Governor Martinez could be convinced to give up their addiction to coal. If you think they should, their contact info is available at the links just above: drop them a line.

How long would it take for America to cut its coal power by 50%? Not as long as utilities and state and national politicians would have you believe.

Think of All Those Flat Roofs in New Mexico

Real Christians Are Not Bigots

If any Christian churches in Albuquerque or Santa Fe want to put up a billboard something like this one by a church in San Diego (maybe excluding the odd “Christianity for All” coda, as my friend Kevin points out), I will make a contribution to make it happen. I encourage my friends, Christian or not, in other states, to make the same offer.
 There are lots of bigots who clothe their bigotry in Christian  makeup. I know many Christians, and hardly a one of them is bigoted. It seems the only ones we hear about on TV or in the news are of the gay-bashing, Koran-burning, funeral-desecrating variety. If there is a war on Christianity, it is this: that the most despicable people who self-identify as Christians are the only ones who get media attention. Fred Phelps has a church that consists almost exclusively of members of his own family. The Koran burner has a church of, I think, 12 members. They get all the media attention they want.
What about the nuns Nicholas Kristof wrote about this week, or the missionaries he’s written about before, who do some of the most caring work in the most dangerous circumstances? What about the Protest Chaplains who have offered counsel during the Occupations in Boston and New York City? Well, they don’t spend a lot of time on PR. Phelps, et al, are mean-spirited attention addicts. The media gives it to them.
It’s time to remember that Christians have founded hospitals, that Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Reverend Ralph Abernathy were  Christians. That Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a Christian. They set the standards. Let’s dust them off and shine them up again. The Christians I know should be proud of who they are and the communities they have made and strengthened. They are not bigots. They are not pro-ignorance, anti-science. Those who are Republicans are not the caricature of Republicans that the Tea Partiers have made of the party – a caricature that my father, a lifelong Republican, would never recognize. The Christians I know are more concerned with being a light and a comfort in the world than they are with being a power in the world.
I will go a step further than my original offer. I am going to seek out churches that feed the hungry, clothe the naked, and comfort the outcasts, here in Santa Fe and in Albuquerque. I’m going to suggest that they, perhaps in concert with other churches (and perhaps also synagogues and mosques and temples) they know, put up a billboard like the one above, and I will promise to raise some of the funds to make that happen. Again, I encourage you to do the same in your home towns.

Dear North Carolina

So you have defined marriage as being between a man and a woman.

Have you considered defining “man” and “woman”?

After all, there are many varieties of gender, not just the two. There are the common XX and XY types. BUt I am told that there are also XXY, XXXY, Y with mutated X, and X with mutated Y, the intersexed, the transgendered and, I am sure, more.

So why stop at defining marriage? Think of the government jobs that could be created by requiring blood tests AND chromosomal and genital exams for every marriage license. For those of indeterminate gender, some kind of panel will have to be formed, to see what gender category the person fits in and whether they can be permitted to love someone who is not their exact opposite in chromosomal distribution.

Really, it’s just like miscegenation: once you say “white” and “black” don’t mix, you’re in a pickle. Who, exactly, is white, and who, exactly, is black? Some definitions really are useless for any but the most academic use, and applying them to law just makes life and governing more difficult.

You think you have settled the matter, NC. But your work has just begun.

President Obama Endorses Same Sex Marriage

President Obama, by endorsing same sex marriage today, spanks North Carolina the day after a large majority of its voters limited its own citizens’ civil rights.

Will the DNC follow Obama’s lead and move the Dem Convention out of Charlotte? Would they hold their convention there if NC had just voted to reinforce segregation?

The last time Dems had their convention in Charlotte, in 1860, they nominated Stephen Douglas. Who ran against Abraham Lincoln. We know how that worked out.

Democrats: Endorse Love, and Leave Charlotte. If you want to share that sentiment with the party, there is a petition here.

Finally, A Tiny Speck Of Justice: Spanish Nun Maria Gomez Valbuena Charged In Baby-Stealing Operation, Refuses To Testify

In a small news story, the Huffington Post reports on the case involving some 300,000 stolen babies. This is big news in other countries, but here in the US, it’s not exactly front page news.

MADRID — An 80-year-old Spanish nun has refused to testify at a court hearing about her alleged involvement in the stealing of newborn babies from their parents and selling them to other families.

Spanish police have investigated hundreds of cases amid allegations of baby trafficking dating from the years after Spain’s 1936-39 civil war and supposedly a few even in the mid-1990s.

Authorities were alerted by an association of people searching for lost relatives. The group alleges the scheme involved a nationwide network, including doctors, nurses, midwives, nuns and intermediaries. Mothers were told their babies had been stillborn.

Sister Maria Gomez is the only person subpoenaed so far. She appeared in court Thursday and told the judge she would exercise her right to remain silent.

Reuters reports that Sister Maria Gomez is charged with “illegal detention and falsifying documents.”

According to Newser, one mother of a stolen infant alleges that Sister Maria Gomez also threatened to steal her other child.

Spanish nun Maria Gomez Valbuena (C) leaves a court in Madrid on April 12, 2012, after refusing to testify before the judge for her alleged involvement in a case of stolen children. (PEDRO ARMESTRE/AFP/Getty Images)

“Stop asking me [where the baby is] or else I will also take away your other daughter and you will go to jail for adultery,” the mother claims Sister Maria Gomez said.

The BBC explains that thousands of babies are thought to have been stolen under Francisco Franco’s dictatorship with the aim of removing children from their “undesirable” left-wing parents and placing them under the care of “approved” right-wing families.

via Spanish Nun Maria Gomez Valbuena Charged In Baby-Stealing Operation.

We’re talking about a baby-stealing operation that continued into the 90′s. Priests, nuns and doctors were involved. One nun has been found to have over a million dollars in her bank account.

The people running the operation told the parents their baby was dead, that they couldn’t see the body, and sold the baby to paying customers. They then falsified all the documents.

I find these crimes so heinous, so offensive and reprehensible, that for the life of me I cannot fathom why it is not front page news around the globe.

300,000 children. It will be hard to follow the trail, since all the facts have been covered up, but just imagine what it would be like to find out you had been one of these babies. You were stolen from your mother and sold to the people you thought were your parents. The people you know as your parents bought you from a baby stealing operation.

In the case of single mothers, that would make at least 600,000 people whose lives have been forever altered beyond belief. If you include the parents who bought the children – who may not have known they were complicit – that would make around 1,200,000 people affected. And once again, the horror is laid at the feet of the Catholic church.

Will the church demand justice for the victims? Will the vast wealth and resources of the Catholic hierarchy be used to help those harmed, bring families back together, and see that justice be done to all those responsible? Not bloody likely. The pattern they have followed for hundreds and hundreds of years is to cover up, to deny, and to protect the wealth and power of the church at all costs.  And it costs the victims of their crimes most.

Raise Your Hand If You Know A Hypocrite Who Benefits From The Government They Hate

Survey Says: Homophobic? Hate Gays? Here’s Your Closet

A new survey shows if you’re strongly homophobic, you might be a redneck gay.

Or both. Imagine the irony, and the fear of being found out. I first began to see it in the Navy. I noticed that the really homophobic men (for instance the ones afraid of gays looking at them in the shower) were afraid of something more than just someone they though was “abnormal”. They were afraid of being attacked, but not because of a real threat. I began to see there real fear: if a gay man came on to them, they might not be able to say no. So they try to prove they don’t have any tendencies by being loudly anti-gay. And t’s not just effeminate guys like Marcus Bachman, it’s also tough jocks who bully the gay kids in high school. And later in church.

So most people in the GLBT community and I have long assumed that if you hate one, you might be one, or at least are afraid of being somewhere higher up the Kinsey scale. Several studies have already shown the correlation, and here’s more definitive proof:

I’ve been saying it for years. Glad I lived long enough to see study after study back me up:

Homophobia is more pronounced in individuals with an unacknowledged attraction to the same sex and who grew up with authoritarian parents who forbade such desires, a series of psychology studies demonstrates.

The study is the first to document the role that both parenting and sexual orientation play in the formation of intense and visceral fear of homosexuals, including self-reported homophobic attitudes, discriminatory bias, implicit hostility towards gays, and endorsement of anti-gay policies. Conducted by a team from the University of Rochester, the University of Essex, England, and the University of California in Santa Barbara, the research will be published the April issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

“Individuals who identify as straight but in psychological tests show a strong attraction to the same sex may be threatened by gays and lesbians because homosexuals remind them of similar tendencies within themselves,” explains Netta Weinstein, a lecturer at the University of Essex and the study’s lead author.

“In many cases these are people who are at war with themselves and they are turning this internal conflict outward.”

The paper includes four separate experiments, conducted in the United States and Germany, with each study involving an average of 160 college students. The findings provide new empirical evidence to support the psychoanalytic theory that the fear, anxiety, and aversion that some seemingly heterosexual people hold toward gays and lesbians can grow out of their own repressed same-sex desires, Ryan says.

Dan Savage makes it clear:

So don’t be homophobic, homophobes, because people might think you’re gay. And if you really don’t want people to think you’re gay, being supportive of gay rights and comfortable with gay people is way better cover than screaming and yelling about the evils of homosexuality. Just sayin’.

via Seattle Columns – Savage Love – Dan Savage – The Stranger, Seattle’s Only Newspaper.

Let the 99% Spring Bloom


Thought I would let you know, if you didn’t already, and ask you to spread the word, that there are trainings in nonviolent direct action all across America from today through Saturday. See the link below for times and places. There will be a number of actions taking place here in Santa Fe, around New Mexico and across the country shortly thereafter. For example,

April 22 is Earth Day. I haven’t heard of specific actions, but they may already be being planned.
April 28 is the March Against the War on Women, in every state capitol
May 1 is the Nationwide General Strike
May 5 is the 350.org action, Connecting the Dots

I have heard of plans to protest the media and corporations later on. We’re getting the ball rolling

The full training lasts 7 hours. (MoveOn is providing a 3 hour version in some places.) I took it a couple of weeks back, when being trained ro train others. It is informative and revelatory, especially for the historically well-behaved, like me. Participants will learn some of the history and effectiveness of nonviolent action, a bit about how our economy got into its current shape, and have opportunities to share and hear the stories of others who are adversely affected by the way things are.

One of the things I like about it is that it builds capacity in people without being prescriptive. There are 60 organizations involved, each with different, albeit overlapping, priorities. This is a truly collaborative effort, and each locale has the freedom and responsibility to use what they learn as they see fit. It is also designed to highlight the resources of those with a history of experience in direct action: there is no assumption that 99 Spring knows best, or that everyone is a beginner. They know that there are community resources ready to lead and educate; 99 Spring provides a context for that to begin.

Our situation is dire, as everyone knows, economically, socially, and environmentally. Let’s get this party started, shall we?


Info on 99% Spring: www.the99Spring.com
Training in Santa Fe: http://moveon.org/event/events/event.html?event_id=128899&id=

Thanks, neighbors. Remember: “People should not fear their governments; governments should fear their people.”

I Hate Taxes

If 2012 Is a Good Year, Politically . . .

it will be because the acts of the people have been so revolutionary as to make the farce of the US presidential election the second biggest political story of the year. At best.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 475 other followers