Are we condemned to relive the Great Depression?

It was actually philosopher George Santayana who said: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”.  Joe Nocera, writing in the New York Times, gives the phrase several new references.

 

The tragedy of Washington today, as the supercommittee begins its task of finding $1.2 trillion in cuts, is that nobody seems to remember the lessons of “Since Yesterday” — and most other books about the Great Depression.

 

Cutting deficits always sounds good. Certainly, nobody wants the inflation that runaway deficits can produce. But in a depressed economy, cutting spending can lead to deflation, which is every bit as ruinous. To read “Since Yesterday” at this particular moment — with the economy hanging in the balance, with President Obama’s jobs program already voted down in the Senate, with fiscal policy so stubbornly focused on the wrong things — is to fear that we are headed for worse times ahead, not better times.

And does anyone really think that history – or any form of book learnin’ – is going to inform the current GOP, bent only on destroying the sitting administration and willing to destroy the country to do it? One of the side effects of so completely demonizing Obama is you begin to believe that anything you do to beat him is worth it.  

 

Read the rest here: The 1930s Sure Sound Familiar – NYTimes.com.

If ever there was a time for outrage, this is it – NYTimes.com

News flash: The New York Times is listening, and getting it. Proof that we still have some populist media left that actually can have their own opinions about what’s going on – opinions that aren’t formed by the status quo or the “you decide” bullshit. Mark Bittman sees the connections to revolutionaries in other countries:

Those scenarios are spreading because, as Naomi Klein wrote in The Guardian last week, “[E]veryone can see that the system is deeply unjust and careening out of control.” The struggle for positive change is being defined by groups as diverse as the revolutionaries in Tunisia and Egypt, the strikers in Greece (“Erase the debt and let the rich pay”), the indignados in Spain, the misled but occasionally well-intentioned members of the Tea Party, and certainly those occupying Wall Street (and, in case you missed it, some 1,500 other places, and growing, as of this writing). Now it’s even being embraced by the Democratic leadership.

Read the rest here: Welcome Activism On Wall Street – NYTimes.com.

Occupy Wall Street: “We all complain, but they showed up.”

Gail Collins has an interesting take on the protests. I think she’s wrong in her conclusions, but there’s food for though here. While she, and many in the media, have focused a little too closely on the mess, she also has some insight:

Democrats are hoping that Occupy Wall Street will become their version of the Tea Party, firing up the troops into the election. But the Tea Party was bankrolled by big Republican donors and cheered on by a big Republican cable network. Also, it is composed mainly of middle-aged and elderly people who have far less energy for meetings.

My bet is that these folks will only be remembered for having been there, taken a stand. But that’s no little thing. We all complain, but they showed up.

Read the rest: Wall Street Weeks – NYTimes.com.

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 475 other followers